Publication Ethics

1. Publication Ethics and Misconducts
   CILAS Journal is a scientific journal that implements a peer-reviewed system in every aspect of its publication process. This statement aims to emphasize the ethical standards that must be adhered to by all parties involved in the article publication process, while also providing guidelines for handling suspected research ethics violations. These parties include authors, editors-in-chief, the Editorial Board, peer reviewers, and the publisher CV. NIMSYA. This statement is based on the COPE Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.
2. Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication
   The publication of articles in the CILAS Journal, which has gone through a peer-reviewed process, is an essential part of the development of quality science. Published articles reflect the quality of the authors and the institutions involved, and support the application of the scientific method. Therefore, it is important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher, and the society. CILAS Journal, as the publisher of CV. NIMSYA, is committed to carrying out the publishing process professionally and responsibly. Editorial decisions are made independently and are not influenced by commercial interests such as advertising or other revenue streams.
3. Allegations of Research Misconduct
   Research ethics violations include creating false data, manipulating data or citations, and plagiarism in research writing and reporting. When these occur, editors have a responsibility to maintain the accuracy and integrity of scientific publications.
   If there are any suspected ethical violations, the editor and editorial board will review them according to COPE guidelines. Manuscripts found to be in violation will be rejected, and published articles may be revised or retracted.
   The first step is to verify whether the allegations are true and constitute a violation of research ethics. Furthermore, the reporter's conflict of interest is also examined. If the allegations of violation are sufficiently strong, the author will be asked to provide an explanation. Afterward, the editor can conduct further review or involve experts if necessary. If no violations are found, clarification or corrections to the published article are sufficient.
   Institutions are expected to conduct proper and thorough investigations into alleged ethical violations. Essentially, authors, journals, and institutions are all responsible for maintaining the accuracy and honesty of scientific work.
   If ethical issues arise, they must be addressed appropriately through appropriate steps, such as article correction or retraction. This way, journals can maintain the quality and credibility of their scientific publications.
4. Publication decisions
   CILAS Journal is responsible for determining which articles are suitable for publication. This decision is based on the quality of the writing and its benefits to researchers and readers.
   Editors adhere to journal policies and applicable laws, such as those regarding plagiarism, copyright, and defamation. In making decisions, editors may also consult with other editors or reviewers.
5. Complaints and Appeals
   CILAS Journal provides clear procedures for handling complaints against the journal, Editorial Staff, Editorial Board, or Publisher. All complaints will be followed up and clarified with the relevant parties. Complaints may involve issues with the editorial process, reviewer unfairness, or other ethical violations. All complaints will be processed in accordance with COPE guidelines.
6. Fair play
   An Editor assesses each manuscript based on the quality of its content and thought, without distinguishing between the author's background such as race, gender, religion, origin, citizenship, or political philosophy.
7. Confidentiality
   Editors and the editorial team must maintain the confidentiality of all information regarding submitted manuscripts. This information may only be shared with relevant parties, such as authors, reviewers, or publishers, as appropriate.
8. Disclosure and conflicts of interest
   Editors may not use the contents or data of unpublished manuscripts for personal gain without the written consent of the author.
9. Duties of Reviewers
   Contribution to Editorial Decisions 
   The peer review process helps editors determine the suitability of articles. Furthermore, reviewers' feedback also helps authors improve the quality of their writing.
   Promptness 
   Reviewers who feel they do not have the appropriate expertise or cannot complete the review in a timely manner should promptly notify the editor and withdraw from the review process.
   Confidentiality 
   Any manuscripts reviewed must be kept confidential. They must not be shared or discussed with others without the editor's permission.
   Standards of Objectivity 
   Reviews must be conducted objectively and professionally. Reviewers should not attack the author personally and should convey their assessments clearly and with reasons.
   Acknowledgment of Sources 
   Reviewers should ensure that authors have cited relevant sources. If any part of the paper is undated or similar to another work, the reviewer should notify the author and editor.
   Disclosure and Conflict of Interest 
   Reviewers must maintain the confidentiality of information obtained during the review process and must not use it for personal gain. Reviewers should also not review manuscripts if they have a conflict of interest with the authors or related parties.
10. Duties of Authors
    Reporting standards 
    Authors should present research results honestly, clearly, and factually. Data used should be accurate and described sufficiently to be understandable and to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.
    Data Access and Retention 
    Authors are asked to provide research data if needed for review purposes. If possible, data may also be made publicly available. Authors are required to retain such data for a specified period after publication and ensure its reliability.
    Originality and Plagiarism 
    Authors must ensure that their work is original. If they use ideas or quotes from others, the source must be properly cited.
    Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication 
    In general, authors should not submit or publish the same work in more than one journal. Submitting the same manuscript to multiple journals is unethical and unacceptable.
    Acknowledgment of Sources 
    Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.
    Authorship and Contributorship of the Article
    Authors should only list those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who made significant contributions should be listed as authors.
    Other parties who assisted but were not primarily involved may be considered contributors.
    The primary author must ensure that all authors have completed the paper, have read, and approve the final content of the article, and agree to its publication.
    Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest 
    Authors must disclose any conflicts of interest, whether financial or otherwise, that could influence the research findings. All sources of funding for the research must also be clearly stated.
    Fundamental errors in published work 
    When an author discovers a significant error in his/her published article, the author should promptly notify the editor and cooperate to correct or retract the article.
11. Ethical Oversight 
    If the research involves chemicals, humans, or animals, authors must explain this clearly and ensure they have followed ethical rules and have the necessary permissions.
    If the research involves confidential data, authors must also explain how the data will be used and kept secure.